My seven-year-old son, Sam, loves this book. And by 'loves' I mean he's read it probably six or seven times through since we first got it from the library. We just keep renewing it so he can read it again. But I'd never read this book before. I know I read a couple of the others in the Melendy Quartet when I was a kid, namely The Four-Story Mistake and The Saturdays. But I definitely never read this, which is a shame, because I would have loved it so much. Perhaps the library system simply didn't have it.
Since Sam loves this series so much, I decided to read one of the books myself. I asked him which one he thought I should read, and he said this one. I liked it so well, I plan to read the other three books too, as I have the time. They are enchanting.
Spiderweb for Two is about two siblings, Oliver and Miranda "Randy" Melendy, who spend many months following little clues on a treasure hunt. Their older siblings have all gone away to school, and at the beginning of the book, Randy and Oliver think they're going to have a terrible year because they're the only ones left at home. Randy thinks Oliver is childish, and Oliver thinks Randy is boring. Over the course of the book, thanks to having to work together to solve riddles and find more clues, they grow to truly like and appreciate each other, which was my favorite aspect of the whole book.
First Line: Randy was certain that this was going to be the worst winter of her life.
Particularly Good Bits:
The truth was that the young Melendys were acquiring a taste for old cemeteries. There was something very peaceful, they thought, about the quiet places; the tilted stones patched with lichens, standing in a bee-humming tangle of myrtle and wild asters (p. 48).
Oliver slept late and no one woke him as it was Sunday. He came down at nine fifteen, hungry as a wolf, and indulged in a waffle orgy (p. 111).
"When you were what?" said Father, setting down his coffee cup. "I wonder if everyone's children act like this; I always thought children just lived normal lives: eating, playing baseball, reading books... not taking waterfalls apart and mislaying their parent's mail." (p. 137)
The children sat on the floor, breathing steamily, utterly absorbed in these different distant people who had been themselves (p. 146).
If This was a Movie, I Would Rate It: G for good, clean fun.
This is my 17th book read and reviewed for the Classics Club, and my 18th book for the I Love Library Books challenge, which means I've completed that challenge too!
I've been tossing around the idea of throwing a blog birthday party for Sherlock Holmes -- traditionally, his birthday has been assumed to be January 6, though I'm not entirely sure how they determined that. But whatever. The point is... I'm going to do it. I'm going to throw a one-day shindig, like a shorter version of my Tolkien blog party, with a bunch of questions that participants can answer on their own blogs, a link-up, maybe some kind of trivia game or something, and a giveaway.
If you think that sounds like fun, please add this badge to your blog or post about this to spread the word :-) And if you feel like chiming in here and saying, "That sounds fun!" then I would have a bit of an idea on how many participants to plan for...
At last! A Pride and Prejudice continuation that does not involve Mr. and Mrs. Darcy's marriage falling to pieces! And Lizzie hasn't lost her satirical wit, nor has she become a basket case because she now has to assume the duties of mistress of Pemberley.
I'm not saying I loved this book, but I definitely enjoyed it. I thought Jane Dawkins captured the characters very well, possibly as well as Amanda Grange. I happen to like the epistolary format for books, though I know it bugs some people. The whole story is told in letters from Elizabeth to her sister Jane, and since I can well imagine the two of them exchanging long, detailed letters, my credulity was not unduly stretched by that format.
However, I did find it silly how the author played "guess what other character from a different Austen novel I'm renaming and inserting here" for the new characters she introduced. Of course the Darcys have many neighbors and must receive them as visitors, go to balls and parties, etc. For some reason, Dawkins decided it would be terribly clever to grab characters from other Austen books, give them new names, and plop them down in the story. I didn't find it clever; I found it stretched my suspension of disbelief too far. Also, I don't like guessing games, which is what they felt like.
But overall, I really did enjoy the book, enough so that I intend to read the sequel. I liked the characters, the plot, the pacing, the writing style. Definitely something I'd recommend to Austen fans. I will say that this Lizzie and Mr. Darcy felt much more like the 1995 portrayals than the 2005, which I think will please many people.
First Line: My dear Jane, Can it really be only several weeks since our joyful nuptials and tearful farewells?
If This was a Movie, I Would Rate It: G. Innocent and nice.
Put this at the top of the list of books I started reading with a ho-hum attitude and wound up absolutely loving. Lots and lots of bloggers have recommended this to me over the past couple of years, so when I saw it on the shelf in the Junior Fiction section at the library, I decided to try it. But I wasn't sure at all that I would like it.
At first, I thought it was cutesy. And, let's be honest: the idea behind it is cutesy. An orphan gets sent to college by an anonymous benefactor who pays her way on the condition that she write him regular letters detailing her progress. Pretty far-fetched and, well, quaint. But that orphan, Jerusha "Judy" Abbott, won the hearts of her benefactor and yours truly with her buoyant worldview and wonder-filled description of life outside the orphanage at last. She was sarcastic, yet sweet; studious, yet playful. I've been enchanted, I tell you.
I did see the plot twist of sorts coming, and was a little annoyed at first that Jerusha didn't. But then I realized that if I was in her position, I would be like, "No way. That could never happen. It would be too big a coincidence." So I figure that's what she thought.
I found a copy of the sequel, Dear Enemy, at the thrift store, so I'm hoping to start that before too terribly long.
First Line: The first Wednesday in every month was a Perfectly Awful Day -- a day to be awaited with dread, endured with courage, and forgotten with haste.
Particularly Good Bits:
Anybody can rise to a crisis and face a crushing tragedy with courage, but to meet the petty hazards of the day with a laugh -- I really think that requires spirit (p. 49).
But aren't the streets entertaining? And the people? And the shops? I never saw such lovely things as there are in the windows. It makes you want to devote your life to wearing clothes (p. 87).
PS. This is one of those wicked anonymous letters you read about in novels (p. 130).
If This was a Movie, I Would Rate It: G. Clean and light and fun.
This is my sixteenth book read and reviewed for the Classics Club and my seventeenth for the I Love Library Books challenge.
I'll be posting a little wrap-up musing as I finish each challenge I participated in this year, or don't finish them, as the case may be. Overall, I've found the challenges to be fun, but also a bit of work. Having to remember to mention what challenge a book went toward in my blog post AND update my counter on my blog page AND go submit the link to the hosting blog's link-up... extra steps mean extra time, and I don't always have much extra time.
Be that as it may, I've already finished one challenge! I challenged myself to read 12 of the books I owned but hadn't read yet, and I have done so. Just for fun, here are the books I read:
January
Shakespeare's Restless World by Neil MacGregor
March
The Phantom Tollbooth by Norton Juster
Two Guys Read Jane Austen by Steve Chandler and Terrence N. Hill
April
The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson
Jane Austen's England by Roy and Lesley Adkins
Edmund Bertram's Diary by Amanda Grange
May
Homicide Trinity by Rex Stout
The Mark of Zorro by Johnston McCulley
June
The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes by Vincent Starrett
August
The Mother-Daughter Book Club by Heather Vogel Frederick
October
Mr. Knightley's Diary by Amanda Grange
November
A Family Affair by Rex Stout
I also read quite a few other books that I own but bought this year, but this challenge is supposed to be about reading books you already owned before the challenge began, so I didn't count them.
I think I'm going to take a break from doing challenges like these in 2015, other than the Classics Club. But if I decide I want to do some again in a year or two, this is definitely one I'd participate in again. I liked that you don't have to submit a list of intended books to read, and since my stack of unread books that I own keeps growing and growing, it was nice to have an incentive to choose from my own shelves instead of borrowing or buying more.
