Hello everyone, James The Movie Reviewer from the movie
review and all around geek blog J and J Productions. First
off, a big thanks to Hamlette for letting me write this guest post for her
Lord of the Rings read-along. For this post, I will be detailing a few
noticeable differences between the Lord of the Rings books and films, along
with providing what I think are likely reasons behind each change and how those changes affect
the overall narrative of the Lord of the Rings trilogy.
Merry, Pippin and
The Hobbits' Naivety
Throughout the course of the Lord of the Rings films, The
Fellowship in particular, Merry, Pippin and the Hobbit race in general
are portrayed as being a very naive and simple people lacking in
common sense. Several scenes attempt to demonstrate the Hobbits' naivety. For
example, Merry and Pippin start a fire that Frodo stomps out, throw stones in
the Watcher's lake, and misuse Gandalf's fireworks. In the book however, Merry
and Pippin are often portrayed as being relatively smart and useful, and by the
end of the book trilogy, they are respected heroes among the Hobbits. There are
two main reasons that the characters were altered in the film: to provide comic
relief and to provide a better starting point for character development.
Throughout the majority of the Lord of the Rings books, there is relatively
little humor, and even though the films were generally darker in tone, the films
needed some levity, and Merry and Pippin provided the needed moments of humor.
On the character development side, starting Merry and Pippin out as fumbling
idiots that grow into brave warriors by the end of film demonstrates a more
substantial character arc, especially since the "Scouring of the Shire"
chapter was removed from the Return of the King film, which is where Merry and
Pippin show their development as characters. Overall, the change was mostly
necessary when looking at the over-arching ramification the alteration makes to
the characters.
Arwen
In the book, Arwen was only mentioned in passing for the
majority of the book with only one or two lines of dialogue through the
entirety of the Fellowship of the Ring. She does not play an important part in
the narrative. Infamously, Arwen is featured heavily in the films.
While some of her scenes with Aragorn were adapted from the appendices, the
most likely reason to add more Arwen scenes was both to provide a female
character in the plot, as well as give Aragorn a stronger romantic interest.
From the standpoint of appealing to more mainstream audiences, adding a romance
and a central female is not a bad idea, albeit one that conflicts with the
original source material. For the most part however, the scenes that are
included are additions to the story that do not affect the overall plot, with
exception of Arwen saving Frodo from the Nazgul. In the book, an elf
named Glorfindel and his horse, Asfaloth, met the Hobbits and Aragorn
on their way to Rivendell. To escape the Nazgul, Frodo rides Asfaloth to
Rivendell by himself. In the movie however, Frodo rides with Arwen to Rivendell
while being chased by the Nazgul. Upon reaching the River Bruinen, Arwen
summons a wave of Water Horses to sweep away the Nazgul, but in the book the
horses were summoned by Elrond. Since Peter Jackson decided to place more
emphasis on Arwen's character, she needed an introduction, and since Glorfindel
is such a minor character, replacing him with Arwen does not drastically change
the overall narrative. However, adding more Arwen to the film does cause a change to
the overall narrative, although not as much as some have claimed. Overall, the
change of adding more Arwen to the film may not have been the best aspect to change,
but it certainly was not the worst.
Tom Bombadil
"Ho! Tom Bombadil, Tom Bombadillo!" Out of all
the changes to the original source material, the complete removal of the
character Tom Bombadil and the chapters that his character is featured in is
the most significant omission in terms of size, but not necessarily in terms of
importance to the story. Although Tom Bombadil is an intriguing character who
is not affected by the Ring's power, he is not particularly important to the
overall narrative. Other than the Hobbits finding their swords, not a lot
happens during those chapters that actually affect the characters or the story.
The lighthearted, almost cheery, tone of the chapters significantly clashes
with the dark and ominous tone of the Nazgul chase in the film that would
precede Tom Bombadil’s part in the story. Also, removing Bombadil’s character
improves the pacing. Because of both reasons, the change to the source material
was certainly warranted.
Frodo's Age
In the book, Frodo's age at the time of Bilbo's one
hundred and eleventh birthday was 33, which is the Hobbit equivalent of a human coming
of age. However, seventeen years elapse between the time of Bilbo leaving for
Rivendell and Gandalf returning to the Shire, which would make Frodo 50 years
of age. Conversely, the movie portrays the time between Bilbo leaving and
Gandalf returning with information about the Ring to be much shorter, possibly
less than a year. Thus, in the movies, Frodo's age would still be a young adult in Hobbit
years. The most logical reasoning behind the change in Frodo’s age in the film
is that a younger, less experienced character is more relatable than a middle-aged guy going through the same experiences, although the book version of Frodo
was a little more heroic and featured a little less character development in
comparison to his movie counterpart. In addition, no one could have played a
better Frodo than Elijah Wood.
(Hamlette's note -- thank you so much for this great guest post, James! Everyone, don't forget to enter James' giveaway on his blog, and mine right here!)